[GHC] #9498: GHC links against unversioned .so files
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Thu Jan 14 17:29:50 UTC 2016
#9498: GHC links against unversioned .so files
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Kritzefitz | Owner:
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler | Version: 7.6.3
(Linking) |
Resolution: | Keywords: Debian
Operating System: Linux | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: Other | Test Case:
Blocked By: 10458 | Blocking: 9237
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s):
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by simonmar):
> No, if we implemented my proposal in comment:16 we would not need the
dependency on C library -dev packages anymore. The -dev package would only
be a build requirement.
I think maybe we're talking about different things, let me try to clarify.
* If you install a Haskell package to be used with GHC, you still need the
`-dev` version of any C library dependencies. That's independent of your
proposal in comment:16, because we need the -dev libraries when building
standalone executables.
* If you install a package because it is a runtime dependency of an
executable or another library, then you don't need the -dev version of C
dependencies. So you could, if you wanted, split compiled Haskell
packages into dev and non-dev distributions.
* The case you seem to be referring to is somewhere between these two,
where you're only using a package in GHCi, or only via the GHC API. In
those cases you could avoid needing the `-dev` dependency, but I'm not
sure how you would distinguish this kind of dependency. How can you tell
that the user isn't going to try to use GHC?
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9498#comment:23>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list