[GHC] #11376: Inconsistent specified type variables among functions and datatypes/classes when using -XTypeApplications
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Sun Jan 10 16:14:15 UTC 2016
#11376: Inconsistent specified type variables among functions and datatypes/classes
when using -XTypeApplications
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: RyanGlScott | Owner: goldfire
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler (Type | Version: 8.1
checker) | Keywords:
Resolution: | TypeApplications
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: Other | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s):
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by kosmikus):
I also noticed that
{{{
$ ghci -XTypeInType -XTypeApplications -XScopedTypeVariables -fprint-
explicit-foralls
GHCi, version 7.11.20151229: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help
Prelude> data Prox a = Prox
Prelude> prox1 :: forall a . Prox a; prox1 = Prox
Prelude> prox2 :: forall (a :: k) . Prox a; prox2 = Prox
Prelude> :t prox1
prox1 :: forall {k} (a :: k). Prox a
Prelude> :t prox2
prox2 :: forall k (a :: k). Prox a
}}}
Is this difference in treatment deliberate? I would have expected that for
`k` to be explicit, I'd have to write
{{{
Prelude> prox3 :: forall k (a :: k). Prox a; prox3 = Prox
}}}
Is there a way to mention a type/kind variable but to still make it
implicit?
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11376#comment:7>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list