[GHC] #11439: Request for comments: Allow duplicate type signatures
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Wed Feb 24 23:02:25 UTC 2016
#11439: Request for comments: Allow duplicate type signatures
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Iceland_jack | Owner:
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler | Version: 7.10.3
Resolution: | Keywords:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s):
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by Iceland_jack):
Replying to [comment:4 adamgundry]:
> I'm not really convinced by the original ticket: couldn't you just as
well do something like
Yes you can at the expense of introducing extraneous definitions, your
solution works fine for the original example but I fear it does not scale.
> On the other hand, being able to declare a bunch of specializations such
that GHCi or Haddock can display them does seem rather useful, especially
for the kind of very polymorphic code you get in `lens` or the post-FTP
Prelude.
Yes, I also emphasise parentheses to shift students' thinking from:
{{{#!hs
map :: (a -> b) -> [a] -> [b]
}}}
to
{{{#!hs
map :: (a -> b) -> ([a] -> [b])
}}}
You would never create a new function to accomplish this minor task but
maybe this definition of `fmap` would prove useful to some:
{{{#!hs
class Functor f where
{-# TYPECHECK
fmap :: (a -> b) -> (f a -> f b) #-}
fmap :: (a -> b) -> f a -> f b
}}}
Who knows.
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11439#comment:7>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list