[GHC] #12514: Can't write unboxed sum type constructors in prefix form
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Sun Dec 18 15:52:09 UTC 2016
#12514: Can't write unboxed sum type constructors in prefix form
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: RyanGlScott | Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler | Version: 8.1
(Parser) |
Resolution: | Keywords:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s):
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by Ryan Scott <ryan.gl.scott@…>):
In [changeset:"b5d788aa0e73fdf22cca3f88962e7652b07073cc/ghc"
b5d788aa/ghc]:
{{{
#!CommitTicketReference repository="ghc"
revision="b5d788aa0e73fdf22cca3f88962e7652b07073cc"
Introduce unboxedSum{Data,Type}Name to template-haskell
Summary:
In D2448 (which introduced Template Haskell support for unboxed
sums), I neglected to add `unboxedSumDataName` and `unboxedSumTypeName`
functions, since there wasn't any way you could write unboxed sum data or
type
constructors in prefix form to begin with (see #12514). But even if you
can't
write these `Name`s directly in source code, it would still be nice to be
able
to use these `Name`s in Template Haskell (for instance, to be able to
treat
unboxed sum type constructors like any other type constructors).
Along the way, this uncovered a minor bug in `isBuiltInOcc_maybe` in
`TysWiredIn`, which was calculating the arity of unboxed sum data
constructors
incorrectly.
Test Plan: make test TEST=T12478_5
Reviewers: osa1, goldfire, austin, bgamari
Subscribers: thomie
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2854
GHC Trac Issues: #12478, #12514
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12514#comment:7>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list