[GHC] #12963: Give -fexpose-all-unfoldings the same semantics as INLINABLE on each function

[GHC]

#12963: Give -fexpose-all-unfoldings the same semantics as INLINABLE on each
function
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
        Reporter:  MikolajKonarski   |                Owner:
            Type:  feature request   |               Status:  closed
        Priority:  normal            |            Milestone:
       Component:  Compiler          |              Version:  8.0.1
      Resolution:  duplicate         |             Keywords:  Inlining
Operating System:  Unknown/Multiple  |         Architecture:
                                     |  Unknown/Multiple
 Type of failure:  None/Unknown      |            Test Case:
      Blocked By:                    |             Blocking:
 Related Tickets:  #12962 #12463     |  Differential Rev(s):
       Wiki Page:                    |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by MikolajKonarski):

 * status:  infoneeded => closed
 * resolution:   => duplicate


Comment:

 Oh, I didn't know the difference between `-fexpose-all-unfoldings` and
 giving all functions `INLINABLE` is so big and so well defined. Given
 that, I drop this feature request in favour of #12463.
 `RECURSIVE_SPECIALISABLE` fits my use case even better and in the worst
 case the proposal may reduce to something similar to `SPECIALISABLE_ALL`,
 so I will focus there. Thank you, Simon! Thank you, mpickering! Closing.

--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12963#comment:7>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler