[GHC] #9509: No automatic specialization of inlinable imports in 7.8
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Sat Dec 3 00:34:56 UTC 2016
#9509: No automatic specialization of inlinable imports in 7.8
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: dolio | Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.3
Resolution: | Keywords:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
Type of failure: Runtime | Unknown/Multiple
performance bug | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s):
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nfrisby):
With no pragma, {{{foo}}} has the following unfolding and gets inlined.
{{{
Unf=Unf{Src=InlineStable, TopLvl=True, Value=True, ConLike=True,
WorkFree=True, Expandable=True,
Guidance=ALWAYS_IF(arity=0,unsat_ok=True,boring_ok=True)
}}}
With the {{{INLINABLE}}} pragma, {{{foo}}} has the following unfolding and
does not get inlined.
{{{
Unf=Unf{Src=InlineStable, TopLvl=True, Value=True, ConLike=True,
WorkFree=True, Expandable=True, Guidance=IF_ARGS [] 210 60
}}}
In both cases, its RHS is just a cast.
I think the inferred {{{IF_ARGS}}} guidance is the cause of this
unexpected behavior, because it violates the {{{"Mind you, then 'choose'
will be inlined (since RHS is trivial)"}}} assumption in {{{Note
[Specialisation shape]}}}, which
otherwise anticipated this consequence of the ({{{IO}}}) newtype.
https://github.com/ghc/ghc/blob/c36904d66f30d4386a231ce365a056962a881767/compiler/specialise/Specialise.hs#L1607
I did not investigate where the {{{IF_ARGS}}} guidance is coming from for
such a trivial declaration. Seems like a leftover from the "actual" RHS
(at the newtype's representative type), in this specific example and
context.
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9509#comment:3>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list