[GHC] #11115: Indicate missing associated type instances
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Fri Nov 20 09:11:36 UTC 2015
#11115: Indicate missing associated type instances
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: rimmington | Owner:
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler (Type | Version: 7.10.2
checker) |
Resolution: | Keywords:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Rev(s):
Wiki Page: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by simonpj):
That's a good idea. But perhaps `PrefixExp Deci` isn't the villain! It
is part of
{{{
Data.Metrology.Suspicious.Poly.SplitPrefix
(PrefixExp Deci) Deci Core
}}}
so perhaps the cause is a missing
{{{
type instance SplitPrefix x Deci Core = ...x....
}}}
I suppose that a possible heuristic would be this:
* When reporting a "cant-match" error with `F t1 .. tn ~ ty`, where `F`
is a type function, generate a "stuck-heuristic" message for `F t1 .. tn`.
To generate a "stuck-heuristic" message for `F t1 .. tn`,
* see if the call is "surely apart" from all the instances of `F`. (See
our closed-type family paper for "surely-apart".)
* If so, report that there is no instance for `F t1 .. tn`.
* If not, find a type-function application in `t1 .. tn` (say `G s1 ..
sm`) that, if reduced, could perhaps make `F t1 .. tn` fire, if any such
application exists.
* And generate a stuck-heruristic message for `G s1 .. sm`
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11115#comment:1>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list