[GHC] #10180: Lint check: Empty alternatives imply bottoming scrutinee
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Mon Mar 23 08:59:07 UTC 2015
#10180: Lint check: Empty alternatives imply bottoming scrutinee
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: nomeata | Owner: nomeata
Type: task | Status: infoneeded
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler | Version: 7.11
Resolution: | Keywords:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Unknown/Multiple
Blocked By: | Test Case:
Related Tickets: | Blocking:
| Differential Revisions:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by simonpj):
> Simon, what would you prefer: Should `exprIsBottom e` hold for all `e`
where the type is a data type with no constructors, or should the lint
check take that into account?
Very interesting.
* What program gives rise to `case (x::Void) of {}`?
* Yes, I think there is a case for making `exprIsBottom` hold for data
types with no constructors; after all, such an expression is bound to
diverge.
* A slightly less pervasive change would to to say that an empty `case`
is ok on a data type that has an empty set of constructors. Less
pervasive in the sense that it affects this Lint check only, whereas the
`exprIsBottom` fix would have broader implications: good ones, I think,
but also rare.
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10180#comment:3>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list