[GHC] #10113: Re-export (<$>) from Prelude
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Sat Mar 7 10:36:17 UTC 2015
#10113: Re-export (<$>) from Prelude
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: hvr | Owner:
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: highest | Milestone: 7.10.1
Component: libraries/base | Version: 7.10.1-rc2
Resolution: | Keywords: AMP
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | report-impact
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Architecture:
Blocked By: | Unknown/Multiple
Related Tickets: #4834 | Test Case:
| Blocking:
| Differential Revisions: Phab:D680
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by Herbert Valerio Riedel <hvr@…>):
In [changeset:"eb3661f2b9f8472f3714774126ebe1183484dd85/ghc"]:
{{{
#!CommitTicketReference repository="ghc"
revision="eb3661f2b9f8472f3714774126ebe1183484dd85"
Re-export `<$>` from Prelude (#10113)
Whether to re-export the `<$>` non-method operator from `Prelude` wasn't
explicitly covered in the original AMP proposal[1], but it turns out that
not doing so forces most code that makes use of applicatives to import
`Data.Functor` or `Control.Applicative` just to get that operator into
scope. To this end, it was proposed to add `<$>` to Prelude as well[2].
The down-side is that this increases the amount of redundant-import
warnings triggered, as well as the relatively minor issue of stealing
the `<$>` operator from the default namespace for good (although at this
point `<$>` is supposed to be ubiquitous anyway due to `Applicative`
being implicitly required into the next Haskell Report)
[1]: https://wiki.haskell.org/Functor-Applicative-Monad_Proposal
[2]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.haskell.libraries/24161
Reviewed By: austin, ekmett
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D680
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10113#comment:2>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list