[GHC] #10653: PatternSynonyms should be imported/exported as part of the wildcard notation
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Sat Jul 18 19:36:26 UTC 2015
#10653: PatternSynonyms should be imported/exported as part of the wildcard
notation
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: gridaphobe | Owner:
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.12.1
Component: Compiler | Version: 7.11
Resolution: | Keywords: pattern
| synonyms
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
| Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Revisions:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by goldfire):
If `Q` belongs to pairs, then is it ever imported with `(..)` attached to
some type? I would guess "no".
I agree that the attachment of patterns to datatypes like this is fishy,
but I see gridaphobe's point that it would be nice to shield the use of
synonyms from clients. What if there were a way to declare that a pattern
is attached to a type? For example:
{{{
module A ( A(.., pattern A1) ) where ...
}}}
By adding `A1` to the export list of the type `A`, then it is imported
with `A` as well. We would probably want a check that `A1`'s result type
is indeed headed by `A`. This seems to make sense in re-exports as well,
in case the pattern synonyms and original datatype are defined in
different modules.
(The use of the `pattern` keyword in there is redundant, but I like it
anyway. Others may disagree.)
gridaphobe, does this address your need?
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10653#comment:3>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list