[GHC] #10585: Implement proper bidirectional type inference
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Wed Jul 8 15:31:17 UTC 2015
#10585: Implement proper bidirectional type inference
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: goldfire | Owner: goldfire
Type: bug | Status: closed
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler (Type | Version: 7.10.1
checker) | Keywords:
Resolution: wontfix | Architecture:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Revisions:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by goldfire):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => wontfix
Comment:
Bah. Well, I tried doing this, and it just made everything worse.
The problem is that, in the nice simple systems in published papers, there
are only a few forms that can make good use of an expected type
(abstractions being the poster child here). However, in GHC, it's just
much, much more complicated, where the vast majority of expression forms
can make good use of an expected return type. So the structural changes I
was hoping would reduce the possibility of errors only improve a few
cases, while making the whole structure more intricate. Not worth it.
I will add a Note though explaining why there aren't two typechecker
functions, though.
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10585#comment:5>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list