[GHC] #9625: ghc: panic using --enable-executable-dynamic
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Mon Jan 26 04:40:54 UTC 2015
#9625: ghc: panic using --enable-executable-dynamic
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: CoreyOConnor | Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Package system | Version: 7.8.3
Resolution: | Keywords:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
Type of failure: Compile-time | Unknown/Multiple
crash | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: | Differential Revisions:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by rwbarton):
So Cabal is building and registering (inplace) a package `bar` with the
field `hs-libraries: bar` and a corresponding shared library `libbar-
ghc7.8.3.so`:
{{{
rwbarton at morphism:/tmp/foo$ ghc-pkg -f dist/package.conf.inplace describe
bar
name: bar
version: 0.1.0.0
id: bar-0.1.0.0-inplace
license: AllRightsReserved
copyright:
maintainer:
stability:
homepage:
package-url:
synopsis:
description:
category:
author:
exposed: True
exposed-modules: Test
hidden-modules:
trusted: False
import-dirs: /tmp/foo/dist/build
library-dirs: /tmp/foo/dist/build
hs-libraries: bar
extra-libraries:
extra-ghci-libraries:
include-dirs:
includes:
depends: Cabal-1.18.1.3-4452332f737ff7dce6018eada45af877
base-4.7.0.1-1a55ebc8256b39ccbff004d48b3eb834 foo-0.1.0.0-inplace
hugs-options:
cc-options:
ld-options:
framework-dirs:
frameworks:
haddock-interfaces: /tmp/foo/dist/doc/html/bar/bar.haddock
haddock-html: /tmp/foo/dist/doc/html/bar
pkgroot: "/tmp/foo/dist"
}}}
However, Haskell libraries usually have `hs-libraries` with names like
`HSbar`.
In b30015e78db99d79cdb48c6c810e3fd49573c5cd GHC started to enforce this,
since it applies different rules for finding the shared library base name
for `hs-libraries` depending on whether they start with `HS` or with `C`.
As far as I can tell this is only used by `rts`, specifically in its
dependency on libffi. I have to say I don't understand why libffi can't
simply be an `extra-libraries` dependency, something to do with library
search paths perhaps?
Is there any other reason for the convention that Haskell library names
start with `HS`? Is this convention documented anywhere?
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9625#comment:3>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list