[GHC] #9948: Recommend class constraint instead of instance constraint
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Tue Jan 6 12:21:15 UTC 2015
#9948: Recommend class constraint instead of instance constraint
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: crockeea | Owner:
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.4
Resolution: | Keywords:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture:
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Unknown/Multiple
Blocked By: | Test Case:
Related Tickets: | Blocking:
| Differential Revisions:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by adamgundry):
I think the message ought to keep saying `No instance for (Num a)` because
that is exactly what is logically missing, as Richard says. There is an
instance for `Foo a`, and it would be very confusing if GHC claimed there
wasn't. I'd be open to the `Possible fix` line saying `(Num a) or (Foo
a)`, but I suspect the work required to change it may outweigh the
benefit.
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9948#comment:3>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list