[GHC] #10189: explicit promotions of prefix data constructors can't be parsed naturally
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Fri Apr 24 01:22:41 UTC 2015
#10189: explicit promotions of prefix data constructors can't be parsed naturally
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Kinokkory | Owner: Kinokkory
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.12.1
Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.4
(Parser) | Keywords:
Resolution: | Architecture:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: GHC rejects | Test Case:
valid program | Blocking:
Blocked By: | Differential Revisions:
Related Tickets: #10188 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Old description:
> When used as an infix operator, a data constructor is explicitly promoted
> simply with `'` prefixed, but when used as a prefix operator enclosed
> between `(` and `)`, it is explicitly promoted only with `'` put before
> `(`, not before the constructor.
>
> On the other hand, messages of GHC and GHCi indicate that a data
> constructor operator in a prefix form is promoted by putting `'` before
> the constructor! (as in `forall (k :: BOX) (k :: BOX). (':*)` below.)
>
> I believe that this is a matter of parsing. The parser should admit
> `(':*)` as well as `'(:*)` for the naturalness of the syntax.
>
> In a GHCi:
>
> {{{#!hs
> > :set -XDataKinds -XTypeOperators
> > data a :* b = a :* b
> > :kind! Int :* Int
> Int :* Int :: *
> = Int :* Int
> > :kind! Int ':* Int
> Int ':* Int :: * :* *
> = Int ':* Int
> > :kind! (:*)
> (:*) :: * -> * -> *
> = (:*)
> > :kind! '(:*)
> '(:*) :: k -> k1 -> k :* k1
> = forall (k :: BOX) (k :: BOX). (':*)
> > :kind! (':*)
>
> <interactive>:1:3: parse error on input ‘:*’
> }}}
>
> (By the way I assume that Template Haskell quotes (`'function` and
> `''Type`) are parsed by the same mechanism as the one for the explicit
> promotion syntax. I hope both styles of quotes for prefix operators will
> be admitted because currently only the `'(` `''(` style is admitted.)
New description:
When used as an infix operator, a data constructor is explicitly promoted
simply with `'` prefixed, but when used as a prefix operator enclosed
between `(` and `)`, it is explicitly promoted only with `'` put before
`(`, not before the constructor.
On the other hand, messages of GHC and GHCi indicate that a data
constructor operator in a prefix form is promoted by putting `'` before
the constructor! (as in `forall (k :: BOX) (k :: BOX). (':*)` below.)
I believe that this is a matter of parsing. The parser should admit
`(':*)` as well as `'(:*)` for the naturalness of the syntax.
In a GHCi:
{{{#!hs
> :set -XDataKinds -XTypeOperators
> data a :* b = a :* b
> :kind! Int :* Int
Int :* Int :: *
= Int :* Int
> :kind! Int ':* Int
Int ':* Int :: * :* *
= Int ':* Int
> :kind! (:*)
(:*) :: * -> * -> *
= (:*)
> :kind! '(:*)
'(:*) :: k -> k1 -> k :* k1
= forall (k :: BOX) (k :: BOX). (':*)
> :kind! (':*)
<interactive>:1:3: parse error on input ‘:*’
}}}
--
Comment (by Kinokkory):
(Removed the mention about Template Haskell syntax.)
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10189#comment:9>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list