[GHC] #10194: Shouldn't this require ImpredicativeTypes?
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Tue Apr 7 14:10:41 UTC 2015
#10194: Shouldn't this require ImpredicativeTypes?
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: kosmikus | Owner:
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler (Type | Version: 7.8.4
checker) | Keywords:
Resolution: | Architecture:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: GHC accepts | Test Case:
invalid program | Blocking:
Blocked By: | Differential Revisions:
Related Tickets: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj@…>):
In [changeset:"553c5182156c5e4c15e3bd1c17c6d83a95a6c408/ghc"]:
{{{
#!CommitTicketReference repository="ghc"
revision="553c5182156c5e4c15e3bd1c17c6d83a95a6c408"
Look inside synonyms for foralls when unifying
This fixes Trac #10194
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10194#comment:4>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list