[GHC] #9118: Can't eta-reduce representational coercions
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Thu May 15 19:06:35 UTC 2014
#9118: Can't eta-reduce representational coercions
------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: goldfire | Owner:
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.2
Keywords: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple
Architecture: Unknown/Multiple | Type of failure: None/Unknown
Difficulty: Unknown | Test Case:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Related Tickets: |
------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
When I say
{{{
import Data.Type.Coercion
import Data.Coerce
import Data.Proxy
eta2 :: Coercible (f a) (g a) => Proxy a -> Coercion f g
eta2 _ = Coercion
}}}
I get
{{{
Could not coerce from ‘f’ to ‘g’
because ‘f’ and ‘g’ are different types.
arising from a use of ‘Coercion’
from the context (Coercible (f a) (g a))
bound by the type signature for
eta2 :: Coercible (f a) (g a) => Proxy a -> Coercion f g
at /Users/rae/temp/Roles.hs:5:9-56
In the expression: Coercion
In an equation for ‘eta2’: eta2 _ = Coercion
}}}
Unlike the case for #9116, this one is ''not'' expressible in Core. (At
least, I don't see a way to do it.) So, to do this, we would have to
update Core and then update the constraint solver. I ''do'' think this
would be type safe. But, I also think it's reasonable to wait for someone
with a real use case to shout before doing this. The only use case I have
is to be able to do this:
{{{
-- says that a's parameter is representational
class Rep (a :: k1 -> k2) where
co :: Coercible x y => Coercible (a x) (a x)
instance Rep f => Rep (Compose f) where ...
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9118>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list