[GHC] #9183: GHC shouldn't expand constraint synonyms
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Wed Jun 11 14:47:06 UTC 2014
#9183: GHC shouldn't expand constraint synonyms
-------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: Feuerbach | Owner:
Type: feature request | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Compiler | Version: 7.8.2
Resolution: | Keywords:
Operating System: Unknown/Multiple | Architecture: Unknown/Multiple
Type of failure: None/Unknown | Difficulty: Unknown
Test Case: | Blocked By:
Blocking: | Related Tickets:
-------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Comment (by simonpj):
I really don't see what we can reasonably do here. e.g.
{{{
type Foo a = (Eq a, Ix a)
}}}
Now if you instantiate and re-generalise it's really not possible to
reconstruct the `Foo a`. I suppose you could have a magical special case
when there is a type synonym for a single constraint. That might, just,
be possible. But it'd be a bit of effort to push it through, so I propose
to wait until more people yell.
Simon
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/9183#comment:10>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list