[GHC] #8634: Relax functional dependency coherence check ("liberal coverage condition")
GHC
ghc-devs at haskell.org
Mon Jul 14 21:34:42 UTC 2014
#8634: Relax functional dependency coherence check ("liberal coverage condition")
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: danilo2 | Owner:
Type: feature | Status: new
request | Milestone: 7.10.1
Priority: high | Version: 7.7
Component: Compiler | Keywords:
Resolution: | Operating System: Unknown/Multiple
Differential Revisions: Phab:D69 | Type of failure: None/Unknown
Architecture: | Test Case:
Unknown/Multiple | Blocking:
Difficulty: Unknown |
Blocked By: |
Related Tickets: #1241, |
#2247, #8356, #9103, #9227 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by simonpj):
Incidentally, on the Phab comment stream, danilo2 says: I'm very attracted
to the idea to be able to throw away liberage coverage condition - in some
places it could give interesting effects (like IncoherentInstances). But
in opposite to IncoherentInstances, I've got a real-life code, which is
right now working using DysfunctionalDependencies and is working great. I
and some people from the company I'm working in were thinking for a long
time if we can replace a very special type class instance with other
mechanisms and we came to a conclusion, that using this extension would be
life saver for us - and this is the reason I started looking into ghc and
implementing it. I would be very happy If you agree with me and would
allow this extension to exist within GHC.
I'm adding the comment in here by way of further motivation.
--
Ticket URL: <http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8634#comment:16>
GHC <http://www.haskell.org/ghc/>
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler
More information about the ghc-tickets
mailing list