[ghc-steering-committee] Please review #673: Amendment to -jsem proposal #540
Adam Gundry
adam at well-typed.com
Tue Oct 29 19:37:05 UTC 2024
It seems Zubin updated the proposal to take account of Sebastian's
concerns, but then discussion has tailed off. Are we now in a position
to accept this proposal, or are there any remaining concerns?
Cheers,
Adam
On 24/09/2024 07:44, Sebastian Graf wrote:
> I think changes to the communication protocol *are* user-facing, in that
> any change to the protocol could implies a breaking change between all
> cabal releases in the future and all GHC releases in the past.
> It appears that is the case for the planned release of
> `semaphore-compat-2`, but I'm not 100% sure.
>
> In that light, I think it's good to discuss in a proposal to ensure we
> do not sign off lightly on such breaking changes, in particular for
> future versions of `semaphore-compat`.
>
> I will express support once compatibility and breaking changes are
> properly addressed.
>
> Sebastian
>
> ------ Originalnachricht ------
> Von "Arnaud Spiwack" <arnaud.spiwack at tweag.io
> <mailto:arnaud.spiwack at tweag.io>>
> An "Simon Peyton Jones" <simon.peytonjones at gmail.com
> <mailto:simon.peytonjones at gmail.com>>
> Cc ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> <mailto:ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org>
> Datum 24.09.2024 04:17:17
> Betreff Re: [ghc-steering-committee] Please review #673: Amendment to
> -jsem proposal #540
>
>> Quite frankly, this is barely any user-facing change at all.
>> Technically the semaphore could previously be shared by non-Haskell
>> processes in ways the updated proposal doesn't allow. But it's not
>> really something people do. So it all sounds reasonable.
>>
>> On Mon, 23 Sept 2024 at 19:10, Simon Peyton Jones
>> <simon.peytonjones at gmail.com <mailto:simon.peytonjones at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I'm happy to support too, but I would like to see presentational
>> changes, so the final proposal makes sense when read in 5 yrs time.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>> On Sat, 21 Sept 2024 at 20:45, Malte Ott <malte.ott at maralorn.de
>> <mailto:malte.ott at maralorn.de>> wrote:
>>
>> I agree.
>>
>> On 2024-09-21 09:16, Eric Seidel wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > This seems like a sensible update to an accepted proposal.
>> >
>> > I recommend we accept the amendment.
>> >
>> > Eric
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024, at 19:00, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > This is minor updates to correct an existing approved
>> proposal.
>> > >
>> > > I approve of these changes.
>> > >
>> > > Erik
>> > >
>> > > Adam Gundry wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Dear Committee,
>> > >>
>> > >> Zubin Duggal proposes to amend proposal #540, which
>> introduced the -jsem
>> > >> parallelism control mechanism, so that it can avoid
>> incompatibilities
>> > >> arising from different system C library implementations:
>> > >>
>> > >> https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/673
>> <https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/673>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> https://github.com/wz1000/ghc-proposals/blob/new-jsem/proposals/0540-jsem.rst <https://github.com/wz1000/ghc-proposals/blob/new-jsem/proposals/0540-jsem.rst>
>> > >>
>> > >> I'd like to nominate Eric Seidel as the shepherd, since
>> he was the
>> > >> shepherd of the original proposal.
>> > >>
>> > >> Please guide us to a conclusion as outlined in
>> > >>
>> https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process <https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process>
>> > >>
>> > >> Cheers,
>> > >>
>> > >> Adam
--
Adam Gundry, Haskell Consultant
Well-Typed LLP, https://www.well-typed.com/
Registered in England & Wales, OC335890
27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX, England
More information about the ghc-steering-committee
mailing list