[ghc-steering-committee] Fine-Grained Unused Warnings (#42)

[Eric Seidel]

I'm generally fine with this proposal, but does it seem strange to anyone else that this is a -f flag rather than a new set of -W flags?

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024, at 02:23, Chris Dornan wrote:
> Indeed — just a gentle reminder that the deadline for amending or 
> objecting to this proposal is this coming Monday 19th.
>
> Chris
>
>> On 15 Feb 2024, at 07:58, Arnaud Spiwack <arnaud.spiwack at tweag.io> wrote:
>> 
>> For the record, Jakob has amended the proposal with the flag on by default. I'm now fully good with the proposal.
>> 
>> On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 14:22, Chris Dornan <chris at chrisdornan.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks Arnaud — I agree with you and have said as much in the thread and asked Jakob to clarify.
>>> 
>>>> On 13 Feb 2024, at 16:57, Arnaud Spiwack <arnaud.spiwack at tweag.io> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I noticed that the default value of the flag is unspecified (I believe that the flag should be on by default, as deactivating transitively unused bindings is pretty situational in my opinion; we may even decide to accept the proposal but without the flag, though I have a feeling that the author wouldn't be willing to implement the flagless version). I made a comment to that effect on Github.
>>>> 
>>>> The rest of the proposal looks good to me.
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 at 11:59, Chris Dornan <chris at chrisdornan.com> wrote:
>>>>> Proposal: Fine-Grained Unused Warnings (#42)
>>>>> Author: Jakob Brünker
>>>>> Rendered proposal: https://github.com/JakobBruenker/ghc-proposals/blob/fine-grained-unused/proposals/0000-fine-grained-unused-warnings.rst
>>>>> Discussion: https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/434
>>>>> Recommendation: Acceptance
>>>>> 
>>>>> ## Summary
>>>>> 
>>>>> The proposal partitions warning about unused identifiers into 
>>>>> 
>>>>> a) bindings that are truly unused (not mentioned anywhere) and 
>>>>> b) bindings that are mentioned exclusively in code that is itself (transitively) unused,
>>>>> 
>>>>> and suppresses the latter unless the -freport-indirectly-unused-bindings flag is specified.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The proposal is concise with some well-chosen examples and I recommend everyone at least skim it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I propose        that we accept this proposal if nobody objects by the start of next week (Monday, 2024-02-19).
>>>>> 
>>>>> Chris
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
>>>>> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
>>>>> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Arnaud Spiwack
>>>> Director, Research at https://moduscreate.com and https://tweag.io.
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Arnaud Spiwack
>> Director, Research at https://moduscreate.com and https://tweag.io.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee