[ghc-steering-committee] Please review #517: Require implementors before proposal submission, Shepherd: Simon PJ

[Simon Peyton Jones]

As you say, it's not that big a deal.  I'm content to reject for now.  I'm
sure we'll keep coming back to it!

Simon

On Sun, 2 Oct 2022 at 13:03, Joachim Breitner <mail at joachim-breitner.de>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, dem 20.09.2022 um 15:43 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> > So given that we don’t have a consensus, I suggest to not spend more
> > time on it, let’s reject it (and remember where it is to be revived, if
> > and when the problem becomes more clearer visible).
>
> no complaints about this either? I’ll mark it as rejected in a few days
> unless someone shouts.
>
> Cheers,
> Joachim
>
> --
> Joachim Breitner
>   mail at joachim-breitner.de
>   http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20221003/31d9c78b/attachment.html>