[ghc-steering-committee] Status
Joachim Breitner
mail at joachim-breitner.de
Wed Jan 13 22:14:22 UTC 2021
Dear Committee,
after 2½ months, time for a new status updates. What was going on here?
* Well, GHC2021 was going on. Lots of it. But it’s actually coming to a close
in five days. It will be exciting to see how it affects the Haskell
landscapes.
* Heh, last status I wrote:
Richard refines the bylaws in #360. Maybe everybody has a second
look now and then we can merge this?
I guess that still applies. Richard and I are discussing a corner case
on the PR, but otherwise approvals are coming in, and unless that changes,
we’ll merge that once we ironed out that wrinkle.
* Simon introduced the position of a nudger, namely Tom.
Tom, below are some PRs where you might need to nudge someone!
* we were asked to review these proposals:
#366: DuplicateRecordFields without ambiguous field access, shepherd: Tom
#242: Unsaturated type families, Shepherd: Richard Eisenberg
#370: Syntax for Modifiers, Shepherd: Alejandro
#387: The Char kind, Shepherd: Alejandro
#368: Warn on prefix/suffix operators, Shepherd: Tom
#381: Visible 'forall' in types of terms, Shepherd: Iavor
* we have a recommendation from the shepherd about:
#369: Add sumToTag# primop, (rec: accept)
#366: DuplicateRecordFields without ambiguous field access (rec: accept)
#381: Visible 'forall' in types of terms (rec: reject)
#242: Unsaturated type families (rec: accept)
#313: Delimited continuation primops (rec: accept)
#370: Syntax for Modifiers (rec: accept)
#387: The Char kind (rec: accept)
* we have sent the following proposals back to revision
#283: Local modules
* we decided about the following proposals
#366: DuplicateRecordFields without ambiguous field access (accept)
#370: Syntax for Modifiers (accept)
#242: Unsaturated type families (accept)
In addition to the two meta-proposals (bylaws and GHC2021), we
currently have to act on the following 7 proposals, up by 2!
Some need some nudging.
## Waiting for committee decision
#387: The Char kind, Shepherd: Alejandro
Looks like it’ll be smoothly accepted, but it’s only a week old.
Will maybe merge in a few days.
#381: Visible 'forall' in types of terms, Shepherd: Iavor
Recommendation was to reject, but discussion went into the more
abstract “whither dependent Haskell”. But what does this mean
for this proposal?
#369: Add sumToTag# primop
Essentially accepted, waiting for feedback from the author on final tweaks
#313: Delimited continuation primops, Shepherd: Simon Marlow
Mostly positive reception, but there was discussion.
Simon, can this be accepted as it, or does it need more work/time/discussion?
#302: \of, Shepherd: Cale
No new discussion. Cale, what is the conclusion?
## Waiting for Shepherd action
#367: Clarify primops using unboxed sums, Shepherd: Simon Marlow
This is aging… we need a shepherd recommendation
#368: Warn on prefix/suffix operators, Shepherd: Tom
Tom, your turn
Cheers,
Joachim
--
Joachim Breitner
mail at joachim-breitner.de
http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
More information about the ghc-steering-committee
mailing list