[ghc-steering-committee] Request for Nominations to the GHC Steering Committee

[Alejandro Serrano Mena]

Dear Haskell community,

The three-year term limit of some of the GHC Steering committee
members has expired. We are really grateful for the awesome work
that Iavor, Richard, and Joachim have done through these years
(especially the latter, who has acted as secretary.) As a result, the
GHC Steering committee is seeking nominations for new members.

The committee scrutinizes, nitpicks, improves, weights and eventually
accepts or rejects proposals that extend or change the language
supported by GHC and other (public-facing) aspects of GHC.
Our processes are described at
   https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals
which is also the GitHub repository where proposals are proposed.

We are looking for members who have the ability
 * to understand such language extension proposals,
 * to find holes and missing corner cases in the specifications,
 * foresee the interaction with other language features and
   specifications,
 * comment constructively and improve the proposals,
 * judge the cost/benefit ratio and
 * finally come to a justifiable conclusion.

We look for committee members who have some of these properties:
 * have substantial experience in writing Haskell applications or
   libraries, which they can use to inform judgements about the
   utility or otherwise of proposed features,
 * have made active contributions to the Haskell community, for
   some time,
 * have expertise in language design and implementation, in either
   Haskell or related languages, which they can share with us.

The committee’s work requires a small, but non-trivial amount of time,
especially when you are assigned a proposal for shepherding. We
estimate the workload to be around 2 hours per week, and our process
works best if members usually respond to technical emails within 1-2
weeks (within days is even better). Please keep that in mind if your
email inbox is already overflowing.

The GHC developers themselves are already well represented already.  We
seek Haskell _users_ more than GHC hackers.

There is no shortage of people who are eager to get fancy new
features into the language, both in the committee and the wider
community. But each new feature imposes a cost, to implement, to learn,
(particularly) through its unexpected interaction with other features.
We need to strike a balance, one that encourages innovation (as GHC
always has) while still making Haskell attractive for real-world
production use and for teaching. We therefore explicitly invite
“conservative” members of the community to join the committee.

To make a nomination, please send an email to me (as the interim committee
secretary) at trupill at gmail.com until February 28th. I will
distribute the nominations among the committee, and we will keep the
nominations and our deliberations private.

We explicitly encourage self-nominations. You can nominate others, but
please obtain their explicit consent to do so. (We don’t want to choose
someone who turns out to be unable to serve.)

On behalf of the committee,
Alejandro Serrano
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20210213/b44cb1ca/attachment.html>