[ghc-steering-committee] #460: better migration for non-magical ~

[Joachim Breitner]

Am Freitag, dem 17.12.2021 um 22:38 +0000 schrieb Richard Eisenberg:
> I recommend acceptance, because immediate breakage of code is bad: it causes kinks in the update cycle after a GHC release. This new migration story should be gentler, and poses little implementation burden.
> 


This sounds like a well-thought-through refinement, thanks Vlad, and I
am happy to follow Richard’s recommendation.

Cheers,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.de
  http://www.joachim-breitner.de/