[ghc-steering-committee] Please review #452: Articulate principles for GHC evolution; Shepherd: Simon PJ

[Richard Eisenberg]

Good point! I have pushed this change.

Thanks,
Richard

> On Dec 12, 2021, at 7:07 AM, Alejandro Serrano Mena <trupill at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I am happy with the proposal. My only suggestion is to include a patch to the main README.md in the repo which links to this particular proposal. This would increase discoverability for those who arrive to the ‘ghc-proposals’ repo for the first time.
> 
> Alejandro
> 
> El 10 dic 2021 17:51:20, Simon Peyton Jones <simon.peytonjones at gmail.com <mailto:simon.peytonjones at gmail.com>> escribió:
>> Dear Steering Committee
>> 
>> I'd like to propose that we accept Proposal #452: Articulate principles for GHC evolution
>> Discussion: https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/452 <https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/452>
>> Proposal:  https://github.com/goldfirere/ghc-proposals/blob/principles/principles.rst <https://github.com/goldfirere/ghc-proposals/blob/principles/principles.rst>
>> Remember, we are not debating the principles themselves, all of which are embodied in earlier proposals.  Rather we are discussing 
>> the usefulness of having  a place where we articulate the principles, and
>> a process for updating them over time, namely by PRs against this proposal
>> The idea is that the latest incarnation of the proposal is always the current set of agreed principles.
>> 
>> Please respond by Friday 17 Dec. Because it seems uncontroversial, I'll take silence as assent, unless a big discussion arises.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Simon
>> 
>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 19:23, Richard Eisenberg <lists at richarde.dev <mailto:lists at richarde.dev>> wrote:
>> Dear Committee,
>> 
>> This is your interim secretary speaking:
>> 
>> Articulate principles for GHC evolution, proposing a new "principles" document to be added to the proposals repo, has been proposed by me.
>> https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/452 <https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/452>
>> https://github.com/goldfirere/ghc-proposals/blob/principles/principles.rst <https://github.com/goldfirere/ghc-proposals/blob/principles/principles.rst>
>> 
>> I propose Simon PJ as the shepherd, as this is something of a meta-proposal, appropriate for shepherding by our chair.
>> 
>> Please guide us to a conclusion as outlined in 
>> https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process <https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process>
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Richard
>> _______________________________________________
>> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
>> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org <mailto:ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org>
>> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee <https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
>> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org <mailto:ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org>
>> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee <https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20211212/03f403b8/attachment.html>