[ghc-steering-committee] Scoping of types
Simon Peyton Jones
simonpj at microsoft.com
Sat Aug 14 15:40:02 UTC 2021
I spoke to Richard about this. He is planning to respond to your call
| What do you think, how should we proceed? Does anyone feel a calling to
| guide this process to a conclusion?
Maybe his shepherding of #425 (invisible binders in type declarations)
is a good fit with that enterprise.
Thank you Richard!
Simon
| -----Original Message-----
| From: ghc-steering-committee <ghc-steering-committee-bounces at haskell.org> On
| Behalf Of Joachim Breitner
| Sent: 09 August 2021 10:55
| To: ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
| Subject: Re: [ghc-steering-committee] Scoping of types
|
| Hi,
|
| I wasn't technically asking you to shepherd it, merely to assign a shephard
| and write the necessary mails and other red tape that I wasn't keen on doing
| on the phone while traveling. But now I have a proper keyboard again, so I
| can do this. Or I can try.
|
| There are three proposals in the air that are somewhat related, and might be
| worth being shepherded together. We have done that before, and it makes
| great sense. In fact, I would consider it within the powers of a shepherd to
| take two related proposal and work them into one.
|
| We have these proposals that related to "type variables and patterns":
| (summaries are mine and might be wrong)
|
| #291: Simplify scoping for type applications in patterns
|
| This makes the "a" in a (Just @a _) pattern to always bind a new
| type variable, it is never an occurrence (as it would be under
| the accepted "#126 Type Varialbes in TPatterns"
|
| #238: Introduce -XTypeAbstractions, limiting -XScopedTypeVariables
|
| This refines/fixes "#155 Binding type variables in λ exprs",
| splits up ScopedTypeVariables, introduces a @(..) short-hand
| (the dots are syntax, not metasyntax).
|
| #420: no-implicit-binds: Adjust defaulting of -XPatternSignatureBinds
|
| This modifies "#285 -XNoImplicitForAll, -
| XNoPatternSignatureBinds", which itself partly breaks out
| existing behavior into two new extensions (ImplicitForAll,
| PatternSignatureBinds)
|
| Fun fact: #285 includes wording like "or, if #238 is accepted:"
|
|
| So, if I see it correctly, we have _three_ accepted proposals related to
| type variables (#126, #155, #285), which are all unimplemented. On top of
| that, we have three open proposals modifying these. This is all very
| confusing and doesn't feel quite effective to me. It's not unusual that
| proposals are accepted but don't get implemented for a while, but it can be
| a sign that they are not quite right yet.
|
| So I am almost of a mind to un-accept #126, #155, #285, and, together with,
| #291, #238, #420 mark then at "needs unifiying revision", and asking the
| authors and all interested parties to come up with one (1) unifying proposal
| that covers it all.
|
| Well, maybe this is a bit too harsh, but in principle it seems more
| productive to juggle this set of unimplemented proposals, proposal modifying
| proposals and conditional proposals.
|
| Or maybe all it needs is a single shepherd who is motivated to clear this
| jungle for us.
|
| What do you think, how should we proceed? Does anyone feel a calling to
| guide this process to a conclusion?
|
|
| Cheers,
| Joachim
|
| --
| Joachim Breitner
| mail at joachim-breitner.de
|
| https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.joachim
| -
| breitner.de%2F&data=04%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Cc73b2d6cfc814077
| 015d08d95b1bc947%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C63764099718817
| 7261%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1
| haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=nUxjVT1dUp8eizt7faWgnuF%2BWWPHj6e2Rug3K
| d5usGU%3D&reserved=0
|
|
| _______________________________________________
| ghc-steering-committee mailing list
| ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
| https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmail.haske
| ll.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc-steering-
| committee&data=04%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Cc73b2d6cfc814077015d0
| 8d95b1bc947%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637640997188177261%
| 7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwi
| LCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=BkvvfLPKEqhO24Q%2FLVJXnW2i%2F5YiesjTMcA6FXC2
| zNI%3D&reserved=0
More information about the ghc-steering-committee
mailing list