[ghc-steering-committee] #380 GHC2021: Voting starts

Wed Nov 25 14:37:41 UTC 2020

 -- the ones with comments
CUSKs: no
-- ^ according to the guide, this is superseded by StandaloneKindSignatures
ConstrainedClassMethods: yes
-- ^ it is implied by MultiParamTypeClasses anyway
DefaultSignatures: no
-- ^ as Joachim says, this should be succeeded by DerivingVia
-- ^ anyway, this is one required for the writer of the class, so no big
deal
DeriveAnyClass: yes
-- ^ I think this makes no harm, and I tend to use deriving (ToJSON,
FromJSON)
DerivingVia: yes
-- ^ even though it’s quite recent, I think it’s quite sensible and I don’t
foresee many changes to it
DisambiguateRecordFields: no
DuplicateRecordFields: no
-- ^ we seem to still be working on this
FunctionalDependencies: maybe
-- ^ this is a hard one! Not so terrible since it’s only required by the
creator of the class, not of the instances
MonadFailDesugaring: yes
-- ^ isn’t this the default nowadays?
MonoLocalBinds: maybe
-- ^ this is implied by GADTs, but otherwise we shouldn’t
MultiWayIf: no
-- ^ still in discussion
NamedWildCards: yes
-- ^ not many people use this, but I think this is the sane default
OverloadedLists: maybe
OverloadedStrings: maybe
-- ^ I would love to see these included, but I agree with the sentiment
that they need more work
PartialTypeSignatures: no
-- ^ I really think that partial type signatures should not be accepted by
default
QuantifiedConstraints: maybe
-- ^ too early, may want to refine this
ScopedTypeVariables: yes
-- ^ I think this is really well understood and people want it
PatternSynonyms: maybe
-- ^ we are still working out the edges of this

-- these seem simple syntactic extensions
-- many of them bring compatibility with the syntax of Java-like languages
BinaryLiterals: yes
HexFloatLiterals: yes
NegativeLiterals: yes
NumDecimals: yes
NumericUnderscores: yes

-- too early but wouldn’t care to introduce it
StandaloneKindSignatures: maybe
ImportQualifiedPost: maybe

-- don’t know
ForeignFunctionInterface: maybe
GHCForeignImportPrim: maybe
InterruptibleFFI: maybe
LexicalNegation: maybe
NondecreasingIndentation: maybe
PackageImports: maybe
ParallelListComp: maybe
StarIsType: maybe
TransformListComp: maybe
UnliftedFFITypes: maybe
UnliftedNewtypes: maybe
UnicodeSyntax: maybe

-- the rest
AllowAmbiguousTypes: no
ApplicativeDo: no
Arrows: no
BangPatterns: yes
BlockArguments: no
CApiFFI: no
CPP: no
ConstraintKinds: yes
DataKinds: yes
DatatypeContexts: no
DeriveDataTypeable: yes
DeriveFoldable: yes
DeriveFunctor: yes
DeriveGeneric: yes
DeriveLift: yes
DeriveTraversable: yes
DerivingStrategies: yes
EmptyCase: yes
EmptyDataDecls: yes
EmptyDataDeriving: yes
ExistentialQuantification: yes
ExplicitForAll: yes
ExplicitNamespaces: no
ExtendedDefaultRules: no
FlexibleContexts: yes
FlexibleInstances: yes
GADTSyntax: yes
-- ^ implied by GADTs anyway
GADTs: yes
GeneralisedNewtypeDeriving: yes
ImplicitParams: no
ImpredicativeTypes: no
IncoherentInstances: no
InstanceSigs: yes
KindSignatures: yes
LambdaCase: yes
LiberalTypeSynonyms: no
LinearTypes: no
MagicHash: no
MonadComprehensions: no
MultiParamTypeClasses: yes
NPlusKPatterns: no
NamedFieldPuns: yes
NoImplicitPrelude: no
NoMonomorphismRestriction: yes
NoPatternGuards: no
NoTraditionalRecordSyntax: no
NullaryTypeClasses: yes
OverlappingInstances: no
OverloadedLabels: no
PolyKinds: yes
PostfixOperators: yes
QualifiedDo: no
QuasiQuotes: no
RankNTypes: no
RebindableSyntax: no
RecordWildCards: yes
RecursiveDo: no
RoleAnnotations: no
Safe: no
StandaloneDeriving: yes
StaticPointers: no
Strict: no
StrictData: no
TemplateHaskell: no
TemplateHaskellQuotes: no
Trustworthy: no
TupleSections: yes
TypeApplications: yes
TypeFamilies: yes
TypeFamilyDependencies: no
TypeInType: maybe
TypeOperators: yes
TypeSynonymInstances: yes
UnboxedSums: no
UnboxedTuples: no
UndecidableInstances: no
UndecidableSuperClasses: no
Unsafe: no
ViewPatterns: yes

On 24 Nov 2020 at 10:34:18, Joachim Breitner <mail at joachim-breitner.de>
wrote:

> Dear Committee,
>
> the requested data (hackage and survey) is in, has been aggregated,
> cooked, seasoned and is ready for consumption. 116 extensions are
> waiting on your assessment, so time to vote!
>
> ## Procedure
>
> Please vote by email to this list, in a response to this thread.
>
> I want to make tallying easy and automatic, and my code will consider
> an extension Foo voted for if you write "Foo: yes" on its own line.
> This means you can include rationales, write "Foo: maybe" and "Foo: no"
> to remind yourself and others that about where you are, and you can
> safely quote other’s mails. For example, if you write:
>
> ---- begin
> example ----
>
> Easy ones:
>
> DeriveFooBar: yes
> OverloadedBen: no
>
> These ones are tricky:
>
> ImplicitExceptions: yes
>  I know nobody likes that one, but I do.
>
> RandomEvaluationOrder: maybe
>  Not sure about this one, here is why…
>
>
> Richard wrote:
>
> DependentHaskell: yes
>
> Rationale: See my thesis
>
>
> I’m not convinced yet, tell me more, so
> DependentHaskell: maybe
>
> ---- end example ----
>
> then you have voted for DeriveFooBar and ImplicitExceptions. Only “yes”
> matters, “no”, “maybe” and “later” are all ignored.
>
> I will shortly send my first ballot around. Also see the end of this
> mail for a copy’n’paste template.
>
> You can update your vote as often as you want. Please always send your
> full votes (I will only consider your latest email). I encourage you to
> do that early, e.g. maybe start with a mail where you list the obvious
> yes and nos, and keep some at maybe and then refine.
>
> The timeline says first votes should be in within two weeks, and then a
> bit more to refine. But the earlier the merrier!
>
> The quota is 8. In particular, if everyone votes (and I hope everyone
> will), an extension won’t make it this round if 4 don’t include it.
>
> ## Data
>
> Please see
>
> https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/ghc2021/proposals/0000-ghc2021.rst#data
> for the data, including explanations. It is intentionally not sorted by
> the data, as the choice of ranking function would already be quite
> influencing.
>
> You may want to play around with that data, e.g. sort it by your own
> criteria etc. I looked long for an online service where I can upload
> the data and allow you to explore it, but then I noticed that that's a
> bit stupid, since we all probably can do it best with Haskell.
>
> So I made it easy to load the data into GHCi, see the instructions at
>
> https://github.com/nomeata/ghc-proposals-stats/blob/master/ext-stats/README.md
> which allow you, for example, to do this
>
> *Main> mapM_ (\E{..} -> Text.Printf.printf "%s: %d\n" ext survey_no) $
> take 10 $ reverse $ sortOn (\E{..} -> survey_no) (M.elems exts)
> AllowAmbiguousTypes: 195
> CPP: 192
> IncoherentInstances: 176
> Arrows: 156
> Strict: 153
> ImplicitParams: 147
> UndecidableInstances: 144
> OverlappingInstances: 144
> Unsafe: 139
> TemplateHaskell: 137
>
> Of course, if someone wants to upload the data somewhere and share
> that, that's also useful.
>
>
> Let me know if some of this doesn't quite work for you, and should be
> improved. Maybe we need a web form instead of mails?
>
>
> ## PS: Blank ballot
>
> To start, you could copy the following into an email
>
> AllowAmbiguousTypes: maybe
> ApplicativeDo: maybe
> Arrows: maybe
> BangPatterns: maybe
> BinaryLiterals: maybe
> BlockArguments: maybe
> CApiFFI: maybe
> CPP: maybe
> CUSKs: maybe
> ConstrainedClassMethods: maybe
> ConstraintKinds: maybe
> DataKinds: maybe
> DatatypeContexts: maybe
> DefaultSignatures: maybe
> DeriveAnyClass: maybe
> DeriveDataTypeable: maybe
> DeriveFoldable: maybe
> DeriveFunctor: maybe
> DeriveGeneric: maybe
> DeriveLift: maybe
> DeriveTraversable: maybe
> DerivingStrategies: maybe
> DerivingVia: maybe
> DisambiguateRecordFields: maybe
> DuplicateRecordFields: maybe
> EmptyCase: maybe
> EmptyDataDecls: maybe
> EmptyDataDeriving: maybe
> ExistentialQuantification: maybe
> ExplicitForAll: maybe
> ExplicitNamespaces: maybe
> ExtendedDefaultRules: maybe
> FlexibleContexts: maybe
> FlexibleInstances: maybe
> ForeignFunctionInterface: maybe
> FunctionalDependencies: maybe
> GADTSyntax: maybe
> GADTs: maybe
> GHCForeignImportPrim: maybe
> GeneralisedNewtypeDeriving: maybe
> HexFloatLiterals: maybe
> ImplicitParams: maybe
> ImportQualifiedPost: maybe
> ImpredicativeTypes: maybe
> IncoherentInstances: maybe
> InstanceSigs: maybe
> InterruptibleFFI: maybe
> KindSignatures: maybe
> LambdaCase: maybe
> LexicalNegation: maybe
> LiberalTypeSynonyms: maybe
> LinearTypes: maybe
> MagicHash: maybe
> MonadComprehensions: maybe
> MonadFailDesugaring: maybe
> MonoLocalBinds: maybe
> MultiParamTypeClasses: maybe
> MultiWayIf: maybe
> NPlusKPatterns: maybe
> NamedFieldPuns: maybe
> NamedWildCards: maybe
> NegativeLiterals: maybe
> NoImplicitPrelude: maybe
> NoMonomorphismRestriction: maybe
> NoPatternGuards: maybe
> NoTraditionalRecordSyntax: maybe
> NondecreasingIndentation: maybe
> NullaryTypeClasses: maybe
> NumDecimals: maybe
> NumericUnderscores: maybe
> OverlappingInstances: maybe
> OverloadedLabels: maybe
> OverloadedLists: maybe
> OverloadedStrings: maybe
> PackageImports: maybe
> ParallelListComp: maybe
> PartialTypeSignatures: maybe
> PatternSynonyms: maybe
> PolyKinds: maybe
> PostfixOperators: maybe
> QualifiedDo: maybe
> QuantifiedConstraints: maybe
> QuasiQuotes: maybe
> RankNTypes: maybe
> RebindableSyntax: maybe
> RecordWildCards: maybe
> RecursiveDo: maybe
> RoleAnnotations: maybe
> Safe: maybe
> ScopedTypeVariables: maybe
> StandaloneDeriving: maybe
> StandaloneKindSignatures: maybe
> StarIsType: maybe
> StaticPointers: maybe
> Strict: maybe
> StrictData: maybe
> TemplateHaskell: maybe
> TemplateHaskellQuotes: maybe
> TransformListComp: maybe
> Trustworthy: maybe
> TupleSections: maybe
> TypeApplications: maybe
> TypeFamilies: maybe
> TypeFamilyDependencies: maybe
> TypeInType: maybe
> TypeOperators: maybe
> TypeSynonymInstances: maybe
> UnboxedSums: maybe
> UnboxedTuples: maybe
> UndecidableInstances: maybe
> UndecidableSuperClasses: maybe
> UnicodeSyntax: maybe
> UnliftedFFITypes: maybe
> UnliftedNewtypes: maybe
> Unsafe: maybe
> ViewPatterns: maybe
>
>
>
>
> --
> Joachim Breitner
>  mail at joachim-breitner.de
>  http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20201125/1cac2644/attachment-0001.html>