[ghc-steering-committee] Please review #366: DuplicateRecordFields without ambiguous field access, Shepherd: Tom Harding

Tom Harding tomjharding at live.co.uk
Wed Nov 4 15:22:14 UTC 2020


Hi all,

I’d like to open committee discussion for DuplicateRecordFields without ambiguous field access. Other committee members have already commented, and I’ll say I’m strongly in favour of this proposal. I definitely see the suggestion here as “tidying up” an unintuitive - perhaps even counterintuitive - behaviour.

https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/366

Thanks,
Tom

PS. Sorry for my recent absence; I think it has been a very strange few months for all us!

On 2 Nov 2020, at 09:08, Joachim Breitner <mail at joachim-breitner.de<mailto:mail at joachim-breitner.de>> wrote:

Dear Committee,

this is your secretary speaking:

DuplicateRecordFields without ambiguous field access
was proposed by Adam Gundry
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/366
https://github.com/adamgundry/ghc-proposals/blob/no-ambiguous-selectors/proposals/0000-no-ambiguous-field-access.rst

I’ll propose Tom Harding as the shepherd.

Please guide us to a conclusion as outlined in
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process

Thanks,
Joachim
--
Joachim Breitner
 mail at joachim-breitner.de
 http://www.joachim-breitner.de/


_______________________________________________
ghc-steering-committee mailing list
ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20201104/78129c05/attachment.html>


More information about the ghc-steering-committee mailing list