[ghc-steering-committee] Record dot syntax: vote results

[Eric Seidel]

I've read through the draft and think it does a nice job of addressing the various camps. I like how you've positioned C2a as a conservative initial direction with room for future extensions, and a set of minimal requirements for future extensions. I'm not particularly fond of the existing ideas for parsing `(e).x` but I support the principle behind it.

Thanks!

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020, at 06:08, Simon Peyton Jones via ghc-steering-committee wrote:
> Thanks Joachim. 
> 
> Everyone: I have extended our choices document with a draft post to the 
> Github thread.
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MgovHRUUNjbuM4nM8qEe308MfbAYRh2Q8PxFHl7iY74/edit?usp=sharing
> 
> Can you review it, for both tone and content?  You have edit 
> permission, so by all means improve the wording.  Look for omissions.  
> I want to bring the discussion to a close, not re-ignite further 
> debate, but be respectful of those who disagree.
> 
> Could you do so this week, by end Friday?   I propose to leave the 
> votes recorded there, but when posting I'll move the post from the 
> document (deleting it from there) to GitHub.
> 
> I'm cc'ing Neil and Shayne, the authors.  Neil, Shayne: I think (and 
> desperately hope!) you'll be content with this outcome.  Can you review 
> my draft post too?
> 
> Simon
> 
> |  -----Original Message-----
> |  From: ghc-steering-committee <ghc-steering-committee-bounces at haskell.org>
> |  On Behalf Of Joachim Breitner
> |  Sent: 30 March 2020 17:48
> |  To: ghc-steering-committee <ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org>
> |  Subject: Re: [ghc-steering-committee] Record dot syntax: vote results
> |  
> |  Dear Committe,
> |  
> |  thanks all for voting. The ranking of votes is now
> |  
> |        C2a > C2b > C4 > C1 > C7 > C6 > C3 > C5
> |  
> |  In particular C2a beats every other options by 7:4 or more, and is
> |  therefore the result of this poll.
> |  
> |  You can see more statistics at
> |  https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cond
> |  orcet.vote%2FVote%2FAB23CE70AC%2F&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.c
> |  om%7Ce27e9c8f455b436e2bee08d7d4ca3538%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7
> |  C1%7C0%7C637211837260982595&sdata=LLWCxVjXxyLqcJUZ9iMgB%2B5QYGMuHFzJga
> |  u9agTakiQ%3D&reserved=0
> |  
> |  So, does this conclude this saga?
> |  
> |  Cheers,
> |  Joachim
> |  
> |  --
> |  Joachim Breitner
> |    mail at joachim-breitner.de
> |  
> |  https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.joach
> |  im-
> |  breitner.de%2F&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Ce27e9c8f455b43
> |  6e2bee08d7d4ca3538%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C6372118372
> |  60982595&sdata=GE%2BBYN7rA7zWgwuKlArv4PR%2Fm3IlmZ7PqWbGpgXUyms%3D&
> |  reserved=0
> |  
> |  
> |  _______________________________________________
> |  ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> |  ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> |  https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmail.has
> |  kell.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fghc-steering-
> |  committee&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Ce27e9c8f455b436e2be
> |  e08d7d4ca3538%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637211837260982
> |  595&sdata=nEx7qjYqnST1TA74HRkgK4O1zW3tvqpM4Dx4ECCig7I%3D&reserved=
> |  0
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
>