[ghc-steering-committee] Please review #233: Higher-order roles, Shepherd: Simon PJ

[Joachim Breitner]

There is a “needs review” label, but in general absence of labels is “under discussion”. (Why? Because non-members cannot set labels and we want new proposals to have that status)

Cheers,
Joachim

Am 4. September 2019 18:41:38 MESZ schrieb Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com>:
>I discussed with Richard and put it back into discussion state.
>
>Is there a label for "under discussion" or is that indicated by the
>/absence/ of a label?
>
>S
>
>|  -----Original Message-----
>|  From: ghc-steering-committee
><ghc-steering-committee-bounces at haskell.org>
>|  On Behalf Of Joachim Breitner
>|  Sent: 07 August 2019 22:03
>|  To: ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
>|  Subject: [ghc-steering-committee] Please review #233: Higher-order
>roles,
>|  Shepherd: Simon PJ
>|  
>|  Dear Committee,
>|  
>|  this is your secretary speaking:
>|  
>|  Higher-order Roles
>|  has been proposed by Richard
>|  https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/233
>|  https://github.com/goldfirere/ghc-proposals/blob/higher-
>|  roles/proposals/0000-higher-roles.rst
>|  
>|  I propose Simon PJ as the shepherd, as he already has had a
>discussion
>|  with Richard on this.
>|  
>|  Please reach consensus as described in
>|  https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process
>|  In particular, talk to the authors before, if you think this should
>be
>|  rejected, and kick off the discussion on Github, following the steps
>|  described under “Now the shepherd proposes to accept or reject the
>|  proposal” in the above link.
>|  
>|  Thanks,
>|  Joachim
>|  --
>|  Joachim Breitner
>|    mail at joachim-breitner.de
>|    http://www.joachim-breitner.de/