[ghc-steering-committee] Question about "Add Unified Namespace" (#270)
Richard Eisenberg
rae at richarde.dev
Wed Oct 16 09:47:05 UTC 2019
Support seems quite positive on that. I think we can commit. (There's not really a shepherd here because it's all internal.)
> On Oct 16, 2019, at 10:36 AM, Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> This is covered in my still-pending PR
> https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/271
> in exactly the way Richard describes.
>
> Can we commit it? It's been pending for ages. But NB: it's not just typography and presentation: it has actual content.
>
> Simon
>
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: ghc-steering-committee <ghc-steering-committee-bounces at haskell.org>
> | On Behalf Of Richard Eisenberg
> | Sent: 15 October 2019 22:08
> | To: Iavor Diatchki <iavor.diatchki at gmail.com>
> | Cc: ghc-steering-committee <ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org>
> | Subject: Re: [ghc-steering-committee] Question about "Add Unified
> | Namespace" (#270)
> |
> | My interpretation is that as soon as discussion (that might change the
> | content of the proposal) picks up, the proposal should go back into the
> | discussion state. It's not good for us to have "pending recommendation"
> | for a long time.
> |
> | Richard
> |
> | > On Oct 15, 2019, at 7:37 PM, Iavor Diatchki <iavor.diatchki at gmail.com>
> | wrote:
> | >
> | > Hello,
> | >
> | > I am the shepherd for #270, "Add Unified Namesapce", which was
> | > submitted for us to review around September 25. I read the proposal
> | > when it was submitted, but pretty much since then there has been
> | > continuing discussion with various new ideas being fleshed out.
> | >
> | > So, I've been waiting for things to stabilize a bit, before I re-read
> | > it, and ask for feedback from the committee. Given that it has been
> | > about 3 weeks, and there are still more comments and suggestions, I
> | > was wondering if it would be appropriate to move it back to the
> | > "discussion" phase,
> | > or if we should leave things as they are and keep waiting.
> | >
> | > Thoughts?
> | >
> | > -Iavor
> | > _______________________________________________
> | > ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> | > ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> | > https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
> |
> | _______________________________________________
> | ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> | ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> | https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
More information about the ghc-steering-committee
mailing list