[ghc-steering-committee] Question about "Add Unified Namespace" (#270)

[Richard Eisenberg]

My interpretation is that as soon as discussion (that might change the content of the proposal) picks up, the proposal should go back into the discussion state. It's not good for us to have "pending recommendation" for a long time.

Richard

> On Oct 15, 2019, at 7:37 PM, Iavor Diatchki <iavor.diatchki at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I am the shepherd for #270, "Add Unified Namesapce", which was
> submitted for us to review around September 25.   I read the proposal
> when it was submitted, but pretty much since then there has been
> continuing discussion with various new ideas being fleshed out.
> 
> So, I've been waiting for things to stabilize a bit, before I re-read
> it, and ask for feedback from the committee.   Given that it has been
> about 3 weeks, and there are still more comments and suggestions, I
> was wondering if it would be appropriate to move it back to the
> "discussion" phase,
> or if we should leave things as they are and keep waiting.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> -Iavor
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee