[ghc-steering-committee] Discussion on #214, Namespace specifiers

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

Am Freitag, den 31.05.2019, 11:15 -0700 schrieb Iavor Diatchki:
> I believe our new process is to have the discussion on Github, so
> please share your thoughts over there.
> 
> I am a bit unclear about the steps in the new process (even though I
> voted for it :-), but as the shepherd I think I am supposed to make an
> initial? recommendation.
> 
> If so, at the moment I am leaning towards a "reject":   I do think
> that the proposal has identified a valid area for improvement, but I
> don't quite like the currently proposed solution---I wrote some
> comments on GIthub as to why.
> 
> Obviously, that's just my opinion, and the discussion would benefit
> from more input from the committee.

if you think it should be rejected, the idea is that you first discuss
this with the authors (on Github), to make sure that they had a chance
to respond to your criticism and make sure they feel understood. Once
that is settled, you follow the steps under
“Now the shepherd proposes to accept or reject the proposal” on
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process

HTH,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.de
  http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20190531/5a3055b8/attachment.sig>