[ghc-steering-committee] GHC proposal #203: PtrRep. Recommendation: accept
Simon Peyton Jones
simonpj at microsoft.com
Tue Mar 19 13:52:34 UTC 2019
Colleagues
I propose that we accept proposal #203 on lifted-ness polymorphism.
https://github.com/andrewthad/ghc-proposals/blob/pointer_rep/proposals/0000-pointer-rep.rst
In particular, the definition of RuntimeRep changes from
data RuntimeRep
= LiftedRep
| UnliftedRep
| IntRep
| ...
to
data Levity = Lifted | Unlifted
data RuntimeRep
= PtrRep Levity
| IntRep
| ...
The goal here is to support levity *polymorphism*, with the main payoff being the ability to store both lifted and unlifted values in the same data types. So, for example
data Array# :: forall (v :: Levity). TYPE ('PtrRep v) -> Type
data MutableArray# :: forall (v :: Levity). Type -> TYPE ('PtrRep v) -> Type
This is a real win compared to having one data type for lifted and one for unlifted values. But they have the same *representation*: both are represented by a pointer.
I believe (although the proposal does not aquite say) that the proposal fully subsumes the earlier (accepted) proposal for unlifted arrays
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/master/proposals/0021-unlifted-array.rst
So that's good!
This proposal seems like a pretty clear win. The only downside is (as so often) that the full types of data types and functions gets a bit more complicated. But we've already accepted that with the levity polymorphism stuff we already have.
Silence = assent 😊
Simon
| -----Original Message-----
| From: ghc-steering-committee <ghc-steering-committee-bounces at haskell.org>
| On Behalf Of Joachim Breitner
| Sent: 03 February 2019 14:13
| To: ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
| Subject: [ghc-steering-committee] Please review #203: PtrRep, Shepherd:
| Simon PJ
|
| Dear Committee,
|
| this is your secretary speaking:
|
| PtrRep has been proposed by Andrew Martin:
| https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/203
| https://github.com/andrewthad/ghc-
| proposals/blob/pointer_rep/proposals/0000-pointer-rep.rst
|
| I propose Simon PJ as the shepherd (he already glimpsed at it, so
| hopefully already has an opinion.)
|
| Please reach consensus as described in
| https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process
| I suggest you make a recommendation, in a new e-mail thread with the
| proposal number in the subject, about the decision, maybe point out
| debatable points, and assume that anyone who stays quiet agrees with
| you.
|
| Thanks,
| Joachim
| --
| Joachim Breitner
| mail at joachim-breitner.de
| http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
More information about the ghc-steering-committee
mailing list