[ghc-steering-committee] Proposal #167 (Deprecated Entities): Request for comments

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

Am Sonntag, den 03.02.2019, 10:45 -0500 schrieb Eric Seidel:
> I'm more bothered by the fact that the data/constructor tag has now
> become 'pattern', which feels to me like it should only apply to
> pattern synonyms. But according to 
> https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/167#issuecomment-425736470
> it sounds like that ship may have sailed already if we want to be
> consistent (which we should!).

We can maybe fix it consistently, and phase out “pattern” (make it an
alias for whatever we choose) … but do we have an obviously appropriate
name?

Cheers,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.de
  http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20190203/bb110a52/attachment.sig>