[ghc-steering-committee] RecordDotSyntax: please express a view
Spiwack, Arnaud
arnaud.spiwack at tweag.io
Thu Dec 12 09:19:40 UTC 2019
After I clicked “send”, and after some verification, I realised that there
was a yet undocumented interaction with pattern synonyms. Namely,
record-pattern-synonym update. I asked the author to document it in the
proposal:
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/282#issuecomment-56491971
.
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 10:15 AM Joachim Breitner <mail at joachim-breitner.de>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 12.12.2019, 10:04 +0100 schrieb Spiwack, Arnaud:
> > Apologies if this message wasn't useful (it probably wasn't). I'll
> probably stay a neutral party for the rest of this process.
>
> I find it very useful. Especially as it reminds us that there is more
> to the proposal than the question about what a space left of the .
> means (which seems to suck in all the attention).
>
> Cheers,
> Joachim
> --
> Joachim Breitner
> mail at joachim-breitner.de
> http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20191212/1ad9140e/attachment.html>
More information about the ghc-steering-committee
mailing list