[ghc-steering-committee] Unhappy proposers

[Manuel M T Chakravarty]

Yes, I think, this is an improvement.

Cheers,
Manuel

> Am 18.04.2019 um 18:21 schrieb Joachim Breitner <mail at joachim-breitner.de>:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> based on this discussion I am making a concrete proposal here:
> 
> https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/221
> 
> The main idea is that if the shepherd intends to reject the proposal,
> they have to first discuss this with the authors, to give the authors a
> chance to respond, tweak, or point out misunderstandings in the
> shepherd’s perception.
> 
> So the process of accepting proposals is unchanged, and still on the
> list, rejecting a proposal is now a two step process: the shepherd
> discusses it with the authors on GitHub (and anyone else interested, of
> course), and then there is a shorter discussion on the mailinglist,
> with hopefully all facts clarified.
> 
> This does not move all discussion to Github yet, so it is the smaller
> change, in a way. But of course committee members are encouraged to
> join GitHub discussions early, especially if they are unhappy with a
> proposal.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Joachim
> 
> 
> -- 
> Joachim Breitner
>  mail at joachim-breitner.de
>  http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee