[ghc-steering-committee] Unhappy proposers

Manuel M T Chakravarty chak at justtesting.org
Mon Apr 22 19:44:21 UTC 2019

Yes, I think, this is an improvement.


> Am 18.04.2019 um 18:21 schrieb Joachim Breitner <mail at joachim-breitner.de>:
> Hi,
> based on this discussion I am making a concrete proposal here:
> https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/221
> The main idea is that if the shepherd intends to reject the proposal,
> they have to first discuss this with the authors, to give the authors a
> chance to respond, tweak, or point out misunderstandings in the
> shepherd’s perception.
> So the process of accepting proposals is unchanged, and still on the
> list, rejecting a proposal is now a two step process: the shepherd
> discusses it with the authors on GitHub (and anyone else interested, of
> course), and then there is a shorter discussion on the mailinglist,
> with hopefully all facts clarified.
> This does not move all discussion to Github yet, so it is the smaller
> change, in a way. But of course committee members are encouraged to
> join GitHub discussions early, especially if they are unhappy with a
> proposal.
> Cheers,
> Joachim
> -- 
> Joachim Breitner
>  mail at joachim-breitner.de
>  http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee

More information about the ghc-steering-committee mailing list