[ghc-steering-committee] Please review: unlifted newtypes, Shepherd: Richard Eisenberg

[Ryan Newton]

I can't tell if SPJ's concerns
<https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/98#issuecomment-350206819>
were addressed by subsequent edits.

I'm general in favor of all things that make low-allocation, strict
programming more practical.  So it is no surprise that this sounds like
music to my ears, and thus I'm inclined to argue for "accept".

Best,
  -Ryan


On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 3:27 PM, Joachim Breitner <mail at joachim-breitner.de>
wrote:

> Dear Committee,
>
> this is your secretary speaking:
>
> Unlifted Newtypes were proposed
> https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/98
>
> I propose Richard Eisenberg as the Shepherd.
>
> Richard, please reach consensus as described in
> https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process
>
> I suggest you make a recommendation about the decision, maybe point out
> debatable points, and assume that anyone who stays quiet agrees with
> you.
>
> Thanks,
> Joachim
> --
> Joachim Breitner
>   mail at joachim-breitner.de
>   http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20180210/14265a0d/attachment.html>