[ghc-steering-committee] GHC proposals
Joachim Breitner
mail at joachim-breitner.de
Mon Dec 3 17:19:43 UTC 2018
Hi,
Am Montag, den 03.12.2018, 17:09 +0000 schrieb Simon Peyton Jones via
ghc-steering-committee:
> The “implemented status does not need to be 100% up to date; but it would be good to explain how to ask for a proposal to be moved from “accepted” to “implemented”.
Yup
> There should be a link in the “timeline” list on
> https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals, so that people can
> find the list. Perhaps “6. Later, someone may implement the
> proposal. We count it as “implemented” when it hits the GHC mater
> banch” <link>
Good point, added:
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#what-is-the-timeline-of-a-proposal
Cheers,
Joachim
--
Joachim Breitner
mail at joachim-breitner.de
http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20181203/f0805b67/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the ghc-steering-committee
mailing list