[ghc-steering-committee] Proposal #79 "Add a :kind!! command to ghci" — propose yes

Manuel M T Chakravarty chak at justtesting.org
Mon Apr 9 23:08:28 UTC 2018


Ok, so it looks like we should bounce this back to the author to improve the syntax and address Richard’s comment. This what I will do unless I hear otherwise by the end of the week. 

Cheers,
Manuel 

> Am 22.03.2018 um 23:26 schrieb Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com>:
> 
> Like Richard
> 
> * I like the goal
> * I hate the proposed command :kind!
> 
> I suppose we could add
>   :eval <expression>
> as a way to evaluate <expression>; a long-form of
>   <expression>
> and then
>   :eval type <type>
> for this proposal.
> 
> Simon
> 
> |  -----Original Message-----
> |  From: ghc-steering-committee <ghc-steering-committee-
> |  bounces at haskell.org> On Behalf Of Manuel M T Chakravarty
> |  Sent: 21 March 2018 02:43
> |  To: ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> |  Subject: [ghc-steering-committee] Proposal #79 "Add a :kind!! command
> |  to ghci" — propose yes
> |  
> |  We need to decide on the Proposal #79 ”Add a :kind!! command to ghci,
> |  to expand type families and type synonyms”:
> |  
> |    (rendered)
> |  https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithu
> |  b.com%2Falpmestan%2Fghc-proposals%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2Fproposals%2F0000-
> |  kind-bang-
> |  bang.rst&data=04%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Cc5767d25630244346d5a
> |  08d58ed5770e%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636571969830
> |  865127%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJ
> |  BTiI6Ik1haWwifQ%3D%3D%7C-
> |  1&sdata=TiBF9Hg1BxieAB2B6Naez9FWiX53Hhfg0BP%2B%2F3MKjHs%3D&reserved=0
> |    (discussion)
> |  https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithu
> |  b.com%2Fghc-proposals%2Fghc-
> |  proposals%2Fpull%2F79&data=04%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Cc5767d2
> |  5630244346d5a08d58ed5770e%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7
> |  C636571969830865127%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIj
> |  oiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwifQ%3D%3D%7C-
> |  1&sdata=VhEDSDfQQM19L3sY1yyuT5cHJ24jroBSdVg19DVWZiE%3D&reserved=0
> |  
> |  I agree that this is useful functionality and it is a simple change to
> |  GHCi. There has been some discussion about the naming of this command,
> |  but TBH I didn’t find any of the alternatives more convincing than
> |  ”:kind!!”, so I’d suggest to stick with that.
> |  
> |  I favour accepting this proposal. Are there any dissenting opinions?
> |  
> |  Cheers,
> |  Manuel
> |  
> |  _______________________________________________
> |  ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> |  ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> |  https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-
> |  committee



More information about the ghc-steering-committee mailing list