[ghc-steering-committee] Please review: Lazy unboxed tuples, Shepherd: Ryan Newton

[Ryan Newton]

Ok, I'll shepherd.

Just to clarify, this is proposed by a user "winterland".  I.e. not
Richard, right? In the process document it is the author that "brings it
before the committee" correct?

I checked and it looks like our process document *does not *specify the
means of our committee discussion.  I propose we discuss this one right
here on this thread, which we've already got sitting in our inboxes.

Best,
  -Ryan


On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 2:58 AM, Joachim Breitner <mail at joachim-breitner.de>
wrote:

> Dear Committee,
>
> this is your secretary speaking:
>
> https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/45
> was brought before the committee, by our own Richard.
>
> I propose Ryan Newton as the Shepherd, just to rotate this role
> properly.
>
> Ryan, please reach consensus as described in
> https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process
>
> I suggest you make a recommendation about the decision, maybe point out
> debatable points, and assume that anyone who stays quiet agrees with
> you.
>
>
> Greetings,
> Joachim
>
>
> --
> Joachim Breitner
>   mail at joachim-breitner.de
>   http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20170711/f20a0d06/attachment-0001.html>