[ghc-steering-committee] What should we start with?

Manuel M T Chakravarty chak at justtesting.org
Fri Jan 27 03:30:13 UTC 2017


+1 

> Am 20.01.2017 um 10:08 schrieb Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com>:
> 
> I'd like to suggest that we ADOPT
> 
> - Update levity polymorphism
> - Constraint vs type
> 
> for 8.2.  They are very well advanced (the former is in HEAD); they tidy up a swamp of bugs; and they are a clear step forward from where we are today.
> 
> Simon
> 
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: ghc-steering-committee [mailto:ghc-steering-committee-
> | bounces at haskell.org] On Behalf Of Joachim Breitner
> | Sent: 19 January 2017 04:27
> | To: ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> | Subject: [ghc-steering-committee] What should we start with?
> | 
> | Hi,
> | 
> | good to have a mailing list, thanks to whoever set it up.
> | 
> | I would like to see us warming up by handling a first proposal before all
> | of us forget that we are on this committee. Which should we get started
> | on?
> | 
> | There are two that have the “Pending review” label: Levity Polymorphism
> | and OverloadedRecordFields
> | https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.c
> | om%2Fghc-proposals%2Fghc-
> | proposals%2Flabels%2FPending%2520committee%2520review&data=02%7C01%7Csimo
> | npj%40microsoft.com%7Cc611cb8538154741391708d4402376e7%7C72f988bf86f141af
> | 91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636203968474183335&sdata=0c0zB1j4wztdCRzYUwbKR
> | HjygAkZ4kZD2Xx1q9Hz5vQ%3D&reserved=0
> | According to our process documents, this label setting should have
> | already triggered our part of the process!
> | 
> | We could also look for proposals that have not been updated in a while
> | (you can sort by that in the issue list) for example
> | * Optional tuple parenthesization
> | <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.
> | com%2Fghc-proposals%2Fghc-
> | proposals%2Fpull%2F19&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Cc611cb8538
> | 154741391708d4402376e7%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C63620
> | 3968474183335&sdata=LKvWS5wWZirzoT4WrR1M8KR0WyXUSTlIhBAkm5eb2h4%3D&reserv
> | ed=0>
> | * Stack pointer stuff
> | <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.
> | com%2Fghc-proposals%2Fghc-
> | proposals%2Fpull%2F17&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Cc611cb8538
> | 154741391708d4402376e7%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C63620
> | 3968474183335&sdata=y897Px1tIgvuypmksVz%2FmSjHS3JEmfWFMQut1I%2BZ6mM%3D&re
> | served=0>
> | and others.
> | I pinged a few random old proposals and asked them to maybe move forward
> | (or abandon).
> | 
> | Greetings,
> | Joachim
> | 
> | --
> | Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
> |   mail at joachim-breitner.de> | https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.joac
> | him-
> | breitner.de%2F&data=02%7C01%7Csimonpj%40microsoft.com%7Cc611cb85381547413
> | 91708d4402376e7%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636203968474
> | 183335&sdata=4fjS%2FYqv7JpLQYafkod66veFw5nKDw8kG%2BRNK09NIB0%3D&reserved=
> | 0
> |   XMPP: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
> |   Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee



More information about the ghc-steering-committee mailing list