[ghc-steering-committee] What should we start with?

[Ben Gamari]

Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com> writes:

> I propose that we adopt the overloaded record field proposal too. I've
> just re-read it -- it's nice.
>
My only question with the ORF proposal is how it interacts with record
pattern synonyms, as I pointed out on the pull request. I do wish that
there was a clearer story for practical polymorphic update, but if Adam
says that this should be compatible with the current proposal then so be
it.

I also vote to adopt.

Cheers,

- Ben

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 487 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20170126/37ca9270/attachment.sig>