[ghc-steering-committee] Please review: Eval class, Shephard: Richard

[Iavor Diatchki]

Hello,

I am not very convinced about the utility of this proposal.  Also, I think
that the current specification could use more details about how the system
should work.   I wrote a comment on the pull-request thread with more
details.

-Iavor

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Joachim Breitner <mail at joachim-breitner.de>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> this is your secretary speaking:
>
> https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/27
> was brought before the committee. I propose Richard as the Shepherd.
>
> Richard, please reach consensus as described in
> https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#committee-process
>
> I suggest you make a recommendation about the decision, maybe point out
> debatable points, and assume that anyone who stays quiet agrees with
> you.
>
> Greetings,
> Joachim
>
> --
> Joachim Breitner
>   mail at joachim-breitner.de
>   http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20170228/351845dd/attachment.html>