[ghc-steering-committee] Mutable constructor fields

[Simon Marlow]

I haven't been pushing this forwards mainly because I don't have the
bandwidth myself to work on the implementation, but if someone else is able
to do that, that would be great.

There are some details of the spec to iron out.  One is a syntactic
decision - whether to use a new keyword "mutable" to indicate mutable
fields or not - I'll request comments on the proposal.  There are other
details of the spec to iron out related to the implementation, but I think
it'll be easier to work through those by starting on a prototype.

Cheers
Simon

On 3 February 2017 at 23:37, Joachim Breitner <mail at joachim-breitner.de>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Am Freitag, den 03.02.2017, 15:29 -0800 schrieb Iavor Diatchki:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am not sure what's the process for this,
>
> it should be labeled as “under review discussion”, ideally by the
> author if the author thinks it is ready for that.
>
>
>
> Greetings,
> Joachim
> --
> Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
>   mail at joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
>   XMPP: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
>   Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20170206/171374cd/attachment.html>