<div dir="ltr">why wouldn't it work?<div><br></div><div>heres my 4.9 gcc build, I believe it should work on any >= 10.7 system that has xcode cli tools installed,</div><div>please let me know if it fails!</div><div>
<br></div><div><a href="http://www.wellposed.com/opensource/ghc/releasebuild-unofficial/ghc-7.8.3-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.bz2">http://www.wellposed.com/opensource/ghc/releasebuild-unofficial/ghc-7.8.3-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.bz2</a><br>
</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Mark Lentczner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mark.lentczner@gmail.com" target="_blank">mark.lentczner@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">I will try to measure on 10.7 later today.<div><br></div><div>Preliminary numbers for gcc 4.9 are even better than clang - it saves 12% over gcc 4.2 builds. However, the gcc runtime isn't the same as the Apple standard... and we are so far at a loss how to package a ghc based on 4.9 that would work for Mac users without gcc 4.9.</div>
<div><br></div><div>- Mark</div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>