Proposal for communication with GHC API users

[Facundo Domínguez]

> Your feedback is appreciated in a new proposal to streamline
> communication with the authors of the GHC API as GHC evolves [1].

Errata:
- communication with the authors of the GHC API
+ communication with the *users* of the GHC API

Cheers!

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 5:19 PM Facundo Domínguez
<facundo.dominguez at tweag.io> wrote:
>
> Dear GHC devs,
>
> Your feedback is appreciated in a new proposal to streamline
> communication with the authors of the GHC API as GHC evolves [1].
>
> The proposal aims to set a process to collect detailed information on
> how users depend on the GHC API, and how GHC developers think these
> dependencies should be adjusted when there are breaking changes.
>
> This proposal is related to the endeavor to stabilize the GHC API [2].
> Although, rather than trying to define a stable API, it sets a process
> to deal with the current state of affairs where users depend on many
> unstable parts.
>
> Looking forward to your thoughts!
> Facundo
>
> [1] https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/issues/24096
> [2] https://discourse.haskell.org/t/charting-a-course-toward-a-stable-api-for-ghc/7646
>
> --
> All views and opinions expressed in this email message are the
> personal opinions of the author and do not represent those of the
> organization or its customers.



-- 
All views and opinions expressed in this email message are the
personal opinions of the author and do not represent those of the
organization or its customers.