Build GHC in GHC2021
Andreas Klebinger
klebinger.andreas at gmx.at
Fri Dec 8 11:33:27 UTC 2023
On a whim tried enabling it by default but it failed first because
GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving is incompatible with safe haskell
and once I disabled GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving it failed with some error
about missmatched kinds.
I would welcome a patch doing this, but it's not a priority. Especially
since it doesn't seem to be as simple as changing
the base language and removing some pragmas.
Am 07/12/2023 um 14:29 schrieb Arnaud Spiwack:
> Indeed. I didn't realise the ambiguity in my wording.
>
> I'd like for GHC to be built, with Hadrian, using GHC2021 as the base
> language.
>
>
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 at 14:01, Tom Ellis
> <tom-lists-haskell-cafe-2023 at jaguarpaw.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 12:53:02PM +0000, Richard Eisenberg wrote:
> > I think this is an excellent idea! So excellent, that we've
> already done it. :)
> >
> > When I try to compile with GHC 9.6.2 (what I have lying around),
> GHC2021 is in effect.
> >
> > Is there something different you were thinking of?
>
> I think Arnaud meant that compilations of GHC's codebase itself should
> use the GHC2021 setting.
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
>
>
>
> --
> Arnaud Spiwack
> Director, Research at https://moduscreate.com and https://tweag.io.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20231208/8ab4a955/attachment.html>
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list