trouble with formatted Haddock documentation for new module
simon.jakobi at googlemail.com
Thu Jan 27 20:07:06 UTC 2022
https://github.com/haskell/haddock/issues/472 is a long-standing,
related issue. Unfortunately I'm not aware of any workarounds.
Am Do., 27. Jan. 2022 um 20:51 Uhr schrieb Norman Ramsey <nr at cs.tufts.edu>:
> In a new module I'm writing for GHC, I define a record type that has a
> ton of named fields. Two of the fields have rather large types.
> Unfortunately, at least with default settings, the Haddock
> documentation that is well-nigh unreadable (image attached). Does
> anyone have a workaround? Hécate?
> (If it's useful, a draft of the offending module can be found at
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org
More information about the ghc-devs