Markup language/convention for Notes?
ben at smart-cactus.org
Wed Apr 13 21:15:39 UTC 2022
Simon Peyton Jones <simon.peytonjones at gmail.com> writes:
> I'm open-minded, but I *really* want the text to be readily readable *in
> the original source file*. So
> * Back-ticks are much better than `@` signs; the latter are too noisy.
> * For code, backticks add clutter. Maybe just intentend text can be
> code? (Unless it's part of a bulleted list.)
In Markdown region of text indented by at least four spaces denotes a
code block element. Unfortunately, Haddock doesn't have a similarly
noise-free syntax, requiring that lines of code blocks begin with `>`.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 487 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ghc-devs